google.com, pub-9591068673925608, DIRECT, f08c47fec0942fa0 All Posts - MEDIA MONITORING OIL AND GAS -->

Complete Graphic Design Course™

Wednesday, January 25, 2017

One Day Stop Production, Small was (No Big Deal)



Not even two months served as Director of PT Pertamina Processing, Toharso faced with serious problems: damage to the refineries that come many times. At least eight times the country's refineries owned by alternately must stop production. Former Director of PT Pertamina Retail shutdown events it describes some of the refinery. "Likened, If you have an old car, to be cared for, if not to strike in the middle of the road," he said.

Why refinery damage often occurs? Pertamina has six refineries. Balikpapan refinery was built in 1948 and most recently was 1980.Yang Balongan refinery, built in the 1990s. After that, no construction of new refineries, the new process unit. If it is old and must be treated. As it is now, Balongan refinery will be shut down for maintenance in total.

The cause of disruption Balikpapan refinery? Steam pipe that goes into one of the leaking plant turbines. Pressure become drop. Then the turbine turns itself off. One of the five turbines not spinning, no electricity. Eventually die all. Cause, plumbing is old. But the tap steam that enters the turbine immediately closed. Refinery road again.

The impact? One day there was no production. The second day of production 70 percent. Sunday back to normal. Leaking pipes have been connected again. S

During the Balikpapan refinery did not operate, how the Fuel Oil Supply? Other refineries increased production to cover the shortfall. Cilacap, Plaju, Dumai and Balongan each accounted for 25 percent. If one day stop production, small.

Additional import? There is no. If the import is only that much, small. Usually imported at least 200 thousand barrels.

Refinery Balikapapan often damaged, why? All inspection problems. Refinery time to care, must not regress.

Not all has been planned? If all the plans are not implemented consistently, yes problems.

How Opportunity loss of his? In the action plan of the company, the refinery may be stopped without a plan (unplanned shutdown) 3-4 days per year. If not exceed it, no loss.

Opportunity loss Balikpapan? Later calculated, what already exceeded the limit. To be sure, if the refinery die, to lose.

What is the harm? If more than planned, would be a big loss. Balikpapan 5 units, 4 units died just a day. One more unit could die a week. Later, averaged over a year. If the past 3-4 days, means red.

Did not operational at its refineries led to opportunity loss reached Rp 1.4 trillion? Who said, from where? Let's count. A day at most diesel 125 thousand barrels per day. The potential loss in refinery margins. For example, my production of Rp 100 per liter, if the price of Pertamax out factory Rp. 105. Meaning I lost margin 5. Not because it does not produce losses. Crude is still there.

Seven days is not normal production, instead of the loss is not a little? Calculated margin lost. For example the price of Rp 5,500 per liter of diesel: If the margin is 5 percent, meaning 25 cents a liter at times 30 percent at times seven days. That the loss.

Up to Rp 1.4 Trillion? No. In 2016 alone, working his losses of US $ 70-80 million. Not up to Rp 1 trillion

IN INDONESIAN

Satu Hari Stop Produksi, Kecil Itu

Belum genap dua bulan menjabat Direktur Pengolahan PT Pertamina, Toharso berhadapan dengan persoalan serius: kerusakan kilang yang datang berkali-kali. Setidaknya delapan kali kilang milik perusahaan negara itu bergantian harus stop produksi. Mantan Direktur Utama PT Pertamina Retail itu menjelaskan peristiwa shutdown beberapa kilang tersebut.“Diibaratkan, Kalau punya mobil tua, harus dirawat dengan baik, kalau tidak mau mogok di tengah jalan,” kata dia.

Mengapa kerusakan kilang sering terjadi? Pertamina punya enam kilang. Kilang Balikpapan dibangun pada 1948 dan 1980.Yang paling baru adalah Kilang Balongan, dibangun pada 1990-an. Setelah itu, tidak ada pembangunan kilang baru, paling unit proses baru. Kalau sudah tua, harus dirawat. Seperti sekarang, Kilang Balongan akan dimatikan untuk perawatan total. 

Penyebab gangguan Kilang Balikpapan ? Pipa steam yang masuk ke salah satu turbin pembangkit bocor. Tekanan menjadi drop. Lalu turbin mati dengan sendirinya. Salah satu dari lima turbin tidak berputar, listrik tidak ada. Akhirnya mati semua. Penyebabnya, pipa sudah tua. Tapi keran uap yang masuk ke turbin segera ditutup. Kilang jalan lagi.

Dampaknya? Satu hari tak ada produksi. Hari kedua produksi 70 persen. Minggu kembali normal. Pipa yang bocor sudah disambung lagi. S

Selama kilang Balikpapan tidak beroperasi, bagaimana Suplai Bahan Bakar Minyak? Kilang lain dinaikkan produksinya untuk menutup kekurangan. Cilacap, Plaju,Dumai, dan Balongan masing-masing menyumbang 25 persen. Kalau satu hari stop produksi, kecil itu.

Tambahan impor? Tidak ada. Kalau impor hanya segitu, kecil. Biasanya impor minimal 200 ribu barel.

Kilang Balikapapan sering mengalami kerusakan, mengapa? Semua masalah inspeksi. Kilang saatnya perawatan, tidak boleh mundur.

Bukannya semua sudah terencana? Kalau semua rencana tidak dilaksanakan secara konsisten, ya masalah.

Berapa Opportunity loss-nya? Dalam rencana kerja anggaran perusahaan, kilang boleh berhenti tanpa rencana (unplanned shutdown) 3-4 hari per tahun. Kalau tak melebihi itu, tak terjadi kerugian. 

Opportunity loss Balikpapan? Nanti dihitung, apa sudah melebihi batasan. Yang pasti, kalau kilang mati, akan rugi. 

Berapa ruginya? Kalau lebih dari rencana, pasti rugi besar. Balikpapan ada 5 unit, 4 unit mati hanya sehari. Satu unit lagi bisa mati seminggu. Nanti dirata-rata setahun. Bila melewati 3-4 hari, berarti merah.

Benarkah tidak beroperasional-nya beberapa kilang menyebabkan opportunity loss mencapai Rp 1,4 triliun? Siapa bilang, itu dari mana? Mari kita hitung. Sehari paling banyak solar 125 ribu barel per hari. Potential loss paling di margin kilang. Misalnya, saya produksi Rp 100 per liter, kalau harga Pertamax keluar pabrik Rp. 105. Berarti saya kehilangan margin 5. Bukan kerugian karena tidak berproduksi. Crude-nya masih ada. 

Tujuh hari tidak berproduksi normal, bukannya kerugian tidak sedikit? Dihitung margin yang hilang. Misalnya harga solar Rp 5.500 per liter: Kalau margin 5 persen, berarti 25 sen seliter di kali 30 persen di kali tujuh hari. Itu yang loss.

Sampai Rp 1,4 Triliun? Tidak. Tahun 2016 saja, working losses-nya US$ 70-80 juta. Tidak sampai Rp 1 triliun

Koran Tempo, Page-4, Tuesday, Jan, 24, 2017

Steam Pipe Leaks, Balikpapan Refinery Off



For three days, refineries are not able to produce solar

The City of Balikpapan, East Kalimantan were struck by a burst of fire as high as tens of meters from the chimney refinery owned oil company PT Pertamina on Sunday, January 15, 2017, at around 00:15 pm. Residents panicked because they thought Balikpapan refinery with a capacity of 260 thousand barrels of oil per day it was on fire.

Fire alarming residents of Kampung Baru that was caused by the leaking steam pipe to the refinery plant. As a result of refinery operations halted. "The leaking pipe pressure drop. Then the turbine shut down, "said Director of Pertamina Processing Toharso. Because the vapor pressure leak, one of the five turbines not spinning, no electricity, all die eventually. Toharso explained, a steam pipe leak as obsolete." Mounted in 1948. Turbine old, in check. That is, the leak is less detectable from the beginning, because the old, "he said.

Bursts of fire coming from the rest of the steam is channeled into the pipe chimney fire. "Once the blackout, all the wasted gas into the chimney. So, the fire was very great, "said Toharso. According to him, the cause of disturbance refineries are maintenance problems." For example, the pump bearing heat, overheat, and then stuck, "he said. Toharso stated, repairs refineries can not quickly." It takes time. Later found out next year."

As a result of the disorder, the potential revenue Balikpapan refinery on January 15, 2017 is estimated to be lost approximately US $ 37.5 million, or Rp 505.2 billion. "The potential is lost because refineries could not produce fuel for a few days. After the outage, the refinery can not operate fully. "It takes time, because the operation of the refinery should be gradual and can not immediately step on the gas," he said.

He showed daily production statistics Balikpapan refinery decreased. Production Premium, a day after the event, can not be done. On January 17 Premium production can be done. But the production of these fuels fell in the 20 to 21 January. "There was a drop in production of 28.5 percent, or only 114 thousand barrels in the seven days," he said.

Average production of Premium in normal conditions during the week was 160 thousand barrels. Balikpapan refinery production of diesel fuel after the incident on January 15 can only be conducted on January 18. For three days, refineries are not able to produce diesel. Production of diesel fuel for 15 to 22 January drop 66.4 per cent of the normal standard of 898 thousand barrels to 302 thousand barrels.

The production of jet fuel after a total blackout last week experienced the sharpest decline. "Production of a new aviation fuel can be conducted on January 21," he said, During the 15- January 22, aviation fuel from the refinery's production dropped 94.8 percent from 95 thousand barrels to 5,000 barrels. The inability of refineries to produce a number of products fuel approximately causing loss of potential income US $ 37.5 million or around Rp 506 billion. Toharso denied the potential loss of income of the refinery. According to him, the day after the outage, the refinery operates directly. Not full capacity. approximately 70-80 percent, "he said. Toharso explains, Balikpapan refinery extinguished completely, the supply of fuel supplied from refineries from other regions, there are no imports.

IN INDONESIAN

Pipa Uap Bocor, Kilang Balikpapan Padam

Selama tiga hari, kilang tidak mampu memproduksi solar

Warga Kota Balikpapan, Kalimantan Timur dikejutkan oleh semburan api setinggi puluhan meter dari cerobong kilang minyak milik PT Pertamina pada Minggu, 15 Januari 2017, sekitar pukul 00.15 Wita. Warga sempat panik karena mengira Kilang Balikpapan dengan kapasitas 260 ribu barel minyak per hari itu terbakar.

Kebakaran yang mencemaskan warga Kampung Baru itu ternyata disebabkan oleh bocornya pipa uap ke pembangkit kilang. Akibatnya operasi kilang terhenti. “Satu pipa bocor tekanannya drop. Lalu turbin mati dengan sendirinya," kata Direktur Pengolahan Pertamina Toharso. Karena tekanan uap-nya bocor, salah satu dari lima turbin tidak berputar, listrik tidak ada, akhirnya mati semua. Toharso menjelaskan, pipa uap bocor karena sudah usang. “Dipasang pada 1948. Turbin sudah tua, di cek. Artinya, kebocoran ini dari awal kurang terdeteksi, karena tua,”kata dia.

Semburan api berasal dari sisa uap yang dialirkan ke pipa cerobong api. “Begitu blackout, semua gas terbuang ke cerobong. Jadi, apinya besar sekali," ujar Toharso. Menurut dia, penyebab gangguan kilang adalah masalah perawatan.“Misalnya, pompa bearing panas, overheat, lalu macet,”tuturnya. Toharso menyatakan, perbaikan kilang tidak bisa cepat. “Butuh waktu. Nanti ketahuan tahun depan.”

Akibat gangguan tersebut, potensi pendapatan Kilang Balikpapan pada 15 Januari 2017 diperkirakan hilang sekitar US$ 37,5 juta atau Rp 505,2 miliar. “Potensi yang hilang itu karena kilang tak mampu memproduksi bahan bakar selama beberapa hari. Setelah pemadaman, kilang tidak bisa beroperasi penuh. “Butuh waktu, karena pengoperasian kilang harus bertahap dan tidak bisa langsung tancap gas,” kata dia.

Dia memperlihatkan statistik produksi harian Kilang Balikpapan yang menurun. Produksi Premium, sehari setelah kejadian, tidak bisa dilakukan. Pada 17 Januari produksi Premium bisa dilakukan. Tapi produksi bahan bakar ini kembali anjlok pada 20-21 Januari. “Terjadi penurunan produksi 28,5 persen atau hanya 114 ribu barel dalam tujuh hari,” ujarnya. 

Rata-rata produksi Premium dalam kondisi normal selama sepekan adalah 160 ribu barel. Produksi solar dari Kilang Balikpapan setelah kejadian pada 15 Januari baru bisa dilakukan pada 18 Januari. Selama tiga hari, kilang tidak mampu memproduksi solar. Produksi solar selama 15-22 Januari drop 66,4 persen dari standar normal 898 ribu barel menjadi 302 ribu barel.

Adapun produksi avtur setelah blackout total pekan lalu mengalami penurunan paling tajam. “Produksi avtur baru bisa dilakukan pada 21 Januari," ujarnya, Selama kurun 15- 22 Januari, produksi avtur dari kilang ini melorot 94,8 persen dari 95 ribu barel menjadi 5.000 barel. Ketidakmampuan kilang memproduksi sejumlah produk bahan bakar menyebabkan hilangnya potensi pendapatan sekitar US$ 37,5 juta atau sekitar Rp 506 miliar. Toharso membantah potensi hilangnya pendapatan kilang tersebut. Menurut dia, sehari setelah pemadaman, kilang langsung beroperasi. Tidak full capacity. Sekitar 70-80 persen,” katanya. Toharso menjelaskan, saat Kilang Balikpapan padam total, pasokan bahan bakar di suplai dari kilang-kilang dari wilayah lain, tidak ada impor.

Koran Tempo, Page-4, Tuesday, Jan, 24, 2017

Threatened Loss Pertamina Rp 1 Trillion



Commissioners will be asked for an explanation of directors.

Refineries owned by PT Pertamina death row throughout the last two months Since December 2016, there were at least ten times more damage and potentially harm the company's financial state-owned oil and gas was Rp 1 trillion more. Sources Some of the upper layers of the company as well as practitioners refineries calculated the potential losses derived from the lost revenue because refineries do not produce fuel oil.

Whereas fixed costs continue to come out "employee salaries must still be paid. Damage most often occurs in Balikpapan refinery or Refinery Unit V2: three times in two months. On 2 December, the refinery in the city in East Kalimantan was extinguished completely because the generator was broken. Outages affecting the operations of a number of units, such as facilities refiners of crude oil, crude distillation unit, and a hydrocracking unit.

The new refinery is operating normally three weeks later, on December 25, 2016. After that, the refinery several times broken again. On January 15, 2017, the refinery outages total return; Also due to damage plants. This time the cause was a leaky steam pipe. Some refinery facilities must also be turned off. The units are turned on and the new normal operations on Saturday, January 21 last.

Damage also occurred at the refinery in Cilacap (Central Java) and Dumai (Riau). Balikpapan refinery as very strategic because it is a supplier of fuel oil in Indonesia's second largest, after the Cilacap refinery. The plant includes two units and is able to process 260 thousand barrels of crude oil per day. One of the main products are solar as much as 125 thousand barrels per day. Pertamina processing director, Toharso, dismiss the potential loss of trillions of rupiah. According to him, the company only loses potential profits refinery. "Margin refinery was not great," he said

Pertamina Commissioner will call the board of directors to seek clarification cause damage to the refinery sequential. "Today we will call the directors to explain the cases of interference and the burning of the refinery," said the Commissioner, Mr. Abeng. Toharso said it is not aware of it.

In repeatedly stopped operating because of damage.

December 2, 2016
Balikpapan refinery: There was an emergency shutdown due to power failure.

December 4, 2016
Balongan refinery: Supply of raw materials at the refinery residue catalytic cracking unit. (RCC) of oil residue processing stopped.

December 7, 2016
Dumai Refinery: Unit HCU HCU 211 and 212 die because of interference with the uninterruptable power supply.

December 11, 2016
Balikpapan refinery: Unit HCU B stop operating because of a problem in the recycle gas compressor.

December 17, 2016
Dumai Refinery: distillate hydrotreating unit (DHDT) stop operating due to leaking tube furnace convection section.

December 20, 2016
Refinery Plaju: Unit FCCU normal operations, delayed from the original target of December 12th. CDU Unit VI delayed from the original schedule November 28th.

December 25, 2016
Refinery Kasim: Unit CRU die because of the failure of the operation K-0-01B. While the CDU and NHT unit die because of the constraints of supply of fuel gas to the heater.

January 15, 2017
Balikpapan refinery: There was an emergency shutdown due to power failure.

IN INDONESIAN

Pertamina Terancam Merugi Rp 1 Triliun

Komisaris akan meminta penjelasan direksi.


Sejumlah kilang minyak milik PT Pertamina mati berturut-turut sepanjang dua bulan terakhir Sejak Desember 2016, terjadi setidaknya sepuluh kali kerusakan dan berpotensi merugikan keuangan perusahaan minyak dan gas milik negara itu Rp 1 triliun lebih. Sejumlah Sumber dari lapisan atas perusahaan itu serta praktisi kilang menghitung angka potensi kerugian berasal dari pendapatan yang hilang karena kilang tidak menghasilkan bahan bakar minyak. 

Padahal biaya tetap terus keluar “Gaji pegawai harus tetap dibayar. Kerusakan paling sering terjadi di kilang Balikpapan atau Unit Refinery V2 yakni tiga kali dalam dua bulan. Pada 2 Desember lalu, kilang di kota di Kalimantan Timur itu padam total karena pembangkitnya rusak. Pemadaman mempengaruhi operasional sejumlah unit, seperti fasilitas penyuling minyak mentah, crude distillation unit, dan hydrocracking unit.

Kilang baru beroperasi normal tiga pekan kemudian, yakni pada 25 Desember 2016. Setelah itu, kilang beberapa kali rusak lagi. Pada 15 Januari 2017, kilang kembali padam total; juga akibat kerusakan pembangkit. Kali ini penyebabnya adalah pipa uap bocor. Beberapa fasilitas kilang pun harus dimatikan. Unit-unit dihidupkan dan baru beroperasi normal kembali pada Sabtu, 21 Januari lalu.

Kerusakan juga terjadi di kilang Cilacap (Jawa Tengah) dan Dumai (Riau). Kilang Balikpapan tergolong sangat strategis karena merupakan penyuplai bahan bakar minyak terbesar kedua di Indonesia, setelah kilang Cilacap. Kilang ini meliputi dua unit dan mampu mengolah minyak mentah 260 ribu barel per hari. Salah satu produk utamanya adalah solar sebanyak 125 ribu barel per hari. Direktur Pengolahan Pertamina, Toharso, menampik potensi kerugian mencapai triliunan rupiah. Menurut dia, perusahaan hanya kehilangan potensi keuntungan kilang. “Margin kilang itu tidak besar,” kata dia 

Komisaris Pertamina akan memanggil jajaran direksi untuk meminta penjelasan penyebab kerusakan kilang yang berurutan itu. “Hari ini kami akan panggil direksi untuk menjelaskan kasus gangguan dan terbakarnya kilang," ujar Komisaris Utama, Tanri Abeng. Toharso mengatakan belum mengetahui rencana ini.

Secara bertubi-tubi berhenti beroperasi karena rusak.

2 Desember 2016
Kilang Balikpapan : Terjadi emergency shutdown karena power failure.

4 Desember 2016
Kilang Balongan : Suplai bahan baku kilang pada unit residue catalytic cracking. (RCC) pengolah residu minyak disetop.

7 Desember 2016 
Kilang Dumai : Unit HCU 211 dan HCU 212 mati karena gangguan pada uninterruptable power supply.

11 Desember 2016
Kilang Balikpapan : Unit HCU B stop operasi karena ada masalah pada recycle gas compressor.

17 Desember 2016
Kilang Dumai : Unit distillate hydrotreating (DHDT) stop operasi karena tube convection section furnace bocor.

20 Desember 2016
Kilang Plaju : Unit FCCU beroperasi normal kembali, molor dari target semula 12 Desember. Unit CDU VI terlambat dari jadwal semula 28 November.

25 Desember 2016
Kilang Kasim : Unit CRU mati karena kegagalan operasi K-0-01B. Sedangkan unit CDU dan NHT mati karena kendala supply fuel gas ke heater.

15 Januari 2017
Kilang Balikpapan : Terjadi emergency shutdown karena power failure.

Koran Tempo, Page-1, Tuesday, Jan, 24, 2017

SKK Migas Finalize Kasuri Block Development Plan



Special Unit of Upstream Oil and Gas (SKK Migas) still discuss development / POD Blok managed Genting Oil Kasuri Kasuri Pte Ltd. Originally, POD Kasuri Block it will be approved this month.

SKK Migas Deputy Head Zikrullah said first POD approval of a block is the authority of the Minister of Energy and Mineral Resources (ESDM), including for Kasuri Block this. SKK Migas only tasked with providing recommendations on the POD to the Minister of Energy and Mineral Resources. Now the company is still discussing plans Kasuri Block development with cooperation contracts (PSC) is concerned. POD The plan will be approved this month. "POD his (Kasuri Block) is in finalisasikan, we'll wait," he said

On the other hand, she confirmed that the Ministry of Industry has asked for allocation of gas from Block Kasuri for the petrochemical industry which will be built around the project. However, it still does not give certainty about the allocation of these gases since there should be further discussed related development costs. "It will be calculated in detail the economics of upstream gas prices according to the capability of the petrochemical industry. If not mistaken, have started approaching (the economics of upstream and gas prices), the formula might later like, "said Zikrullah.

Previously mentioned, Block Kasuri is expected to start first production in late 2019. The block is expected to produce gas about 285 million standard cubic per day / MMSCFD. This gas source that is Red Square, Smoke, and Kido.

Zikrullah said gas production from Block Kasuri will be prioritized to meet domestic demand. Although the domestic supply obligation (domestic market obligation / DMO) are limited to 25%, the gas supply to the country is not restricted numbers. Gas export options also remain open. "It (domestic supply) is discussed first. From our (gas production) for the maximum benefit for the country, "he said.

Until now, Genting Oil has invested US $ 900 million. These funds are used by a Malaysian oil and gas company to drill 10 exploration wells spread across three fields in Block Kasuri. At the beginning of the discovery of oil and gas reserves in Block Kasuri in 2014 ago, the amount of oil and gas potential in this block is estimated at a minimum of 2 trillion cubic feet.

IN INDONESIAN

SKK Migas Finalisasi Rencana Pengembangan Blok Kasuri

Satuan Kerja Khusus Pelaksana Kegiatan Usaha Hulu Minyak dan Gas Bumi (SKK Migas) masih membahas rencana pengembangan/POD Blok Kasuri yang dikelola Genting Oil Kasuri Pte Ltd. Sedianya, POD Blok Kasuri itu akan disetujui bulan ini.

Wakil Kepala SKK Migas Zikrullah mengatakan, persetujuan POD pertama suatu blok merupakan wewenang Menteri Energi dan Sumber Daya Mineral (ESDM), termasuk untuk Blok Kasuri ini. SKK Migas hanya bertugas memberikan rekomendasi atas POD tersebut kepada Menteri ESDM. Kini pihaknya masih membahas rencana pengembangan Blok Kasuri ini dengan kontraktor kontrak kerja sama (KKKS) yang bersangkutan. Rencananya POD bakal disetujui pada bulan ini. “POD-nya (Blok Kasuri) sedang di finalisasikan, kita tunggu,” kata dia 

Di sisi lain, dia membenarkan bahwa Kementerian Perindustrian telah meminta alokasi gas dari Blok Kasuri untuk industri petrokimia yang akan dibangun di sekitar proyek tersebut. Namun, pihaknya masih belum memberikan kepastian soal alokasi gas ini mengingat masih harus dibahas lebih lanjut terkait biaya pengembangan. “Nanti dihitung secara detail keekonomian hulu dengan harga gas sesuai kemampuan industri petrokimia. Kalau tidak salah, sudah mulai mendekat (keekonomian hulu dan harga gas), nanti mungkin formulanya seperti apa,” papar Zikrullah.

Sebelumnya disebutkan, Blok Kasuri diharapkan dapat mulai produksi pertama pada akhir 2019. Blok ini diperkirakan mampu memproduksi gas sekitar 285 million standard cubic per day/mmscfd. Sumber gas ini yakni Lapangan Merah, Asap, dan Kido.

Zikrullah menuturkan, produksi gas dari Blok Kasuri akan diutamakan untuk memenuhi kebutuhan dalam negeri. Meski kewajiban pasokan domestik (domestic market obligation/DMO) dibatasi 25%, pasokan gas ke dalam negeri tidak dibatasi angka tersebut. Opsi ekspor gas juga tetap dibuka. “Itu (pasokan dalam negeri) dibahas dulu. Dari kami, (produksi gas) untuk sebesar-besarnya untuk dalam negeri,” ujar dia.

Sampai saat ini, Genting Oil telah mengeluarkan investasi sebesar US$ 900 juta. Dana ini digunakan perusahaan migas asal Malaysia itu untuk mengebor 10 sumur eksplorasi yang tersebar di tiga lapangan di Blok Kasuri. Pada awal penemuan cadangan migas di Blok Kasuri pada 2014 lampau, besaran potensi migas di blok ini diperkirakan minimal sebesar 2 triliun kaki kubik.

Investor Daily, Page-9, Tuesday, Jan, 24, 2017

Upstream Oil and Gas Investment US $ 4-50 Billion



Amid fears of a new policy of US President Donald Trump, investment in upstream oil and gas activities which had declined in the past two years again increased 3% to US $ 450 billion this year. Crude oil prices are expected slightly raised to break even at a price of US $ 45 per barrel. This year, the price of Brent crude oil is expected to reach an average of US $ 57 per barrel, up 30% from US $ 44 per barrel in 2016 "activities in the upstream oil and gas companies began to increase again this year. While the price of crude oil, although increasing, are not going to experience a surge means, "said Andrew Harwood, oil and gas analyst from Wood Mackenzie Singapore.

Responded to the demand for crude oil to increase, the company will raise its upstream oil and gas production, including the United States under the new government. Large price spikes will not happen because of the additional supply will depress prices.



Although up 3%, said Andrew, total upstream oil and gas investment this year is still around 40% compared to 2014. In contrast to earlier times, oil and gas companies are now switching from oil and gas projects are large and complex for smaller projects with faster rate of return on capital , "Efficiency is a major concern by utilizing cutting-edge technology," he said.

Investment activities in the upstream oil and gas, says Andrew, is highly dependent on the regulation of a country. Investors often compare the prospects of investment and upstream oil and gas fiscal policies in one country to another. There is a nice country prospects, but less good fiscal policy. There is a nice country both, but some are not good both ways.

Upstream oil and gas investment in Indonesia, according to Andrew, is considered quite prospective and fiscal policy gives enough incentive. While Malaysia is considered more prospective than Indonesia. However, fiscal policy less interesting than Indonesia. Malaysia does not provide an incentive of Indonesia. According to Wood Mackenzie, Brazil and Mexico have good prospects, but less supportive fiscal policy.

While Norway, Mozambique, and Nigeria is better than Indonesia in fiscal incentives and investment prospects. Rating Wood Mackenzie has considered the gross policy split that was implemented by the government. Although there are no foreign investors who use it, profit-sharing scheme in gross split draw enough. Until today, the new Offshore North-West Java Pertamina, which take advantage of this new policy.

Gross split-sharing schemes applied to the new company. Medium companies are running still refers to the old rules-based cost recovery. Vice President External Relations SKK Migas Taslim Z Yunus explained, it could not assess the effectiveness of the new regulations that are applied through the Energy and Mineral Resources Regulation. "The policy is still new. Investors are still studying, "he said.

Upstream oil and gas business community who attended the discussion is optimistic, investment in upstream oil and gas in Indonesia began to rise this year. Vice President Development and Relations Conoco Phillips Joang Laksanto said, arousal oil and gas investment this year mainly due to rising crude oil prices. Not because of government policies that have not been tested. In calculating the gross revenue share split, the component that counts is the oil and gas reserves, investment costs, and price. "This calculation should be submitted only to the investor. But, in the upstream oil and gas management is still subject to the oil and gas law, "he said.

Investment in upstream oil and gas in Indonesia, Joang said, quite heavy. Because the success ratio below 10%, far below the world average, which reached 30%. When conducting exploration, large costs had to be issued for a successful investor is below 10%. As is known, began in January 2017, the government changed the scheme of the production sharing contract (PSC) on new oil and gas contracts. If used previously is refundable fee scheme (cost recovery) then applied the new rule is a gross scheme split.

The provisions set forth in the Regulation of the Minister ESDM No. 8 of 2017 concerning the Production Sharing Contract Gross Split. Deputy Minister Arcandra Tahar stated, the application of split or gross schemes for gross proceeds in the cooperation contract (production sharing contract / PSC) of oil and gas will not harm the state. This scheme makes the country avoid potential cost overruns oil and gas projects, so that revenues derived from oil and gas sector more certain and secure.

Arcandra confirms, investors who felt the split earned enough, you can submit it to the government. For results after inserting variable and progressive split split is still open to change. "If the commercial, there is room for negotiation about 5%," he said.

That, said Arcandra, in accordance with Article 7 of the Regulations the Minister ESDM No. 8 of 2017 on Production Sharing Contracts Gross Split which became the basis for the gross split. In this policy is mentioned, when calculating commercialization field does not reach a certain economic value, the contractor received an additional split a maximum of 5%. "On the contrary, in the calculation of the commercialization of the field exceeds a certain economic value, the state may take a split Supplement 5%," he said.

Less attractive

Meanwhile, investors assessed the gross split scheme offered by the government is still less attractive. Investor wants, although the scheme changed to gross split contract, for the results received at least equal to when using the cost recovery scheme. Investors also requested an additional incentive for exploration. In addition, there is uncertainty related to the implementation of the ease of business process promised by the government.

Chief Executive Officer (CED) and President of PT Ephindo Sammy Hamzah said non-conventional oil and gas investor proposes the implementation of the scheme gross split in oil and gas contracts in order to project more attractive. Therefore, Sammy said, it is very appreciated efforts of government then issued a ministerial regulation about gross split. Moreover, Regulation 38/2015 on Acceleration of Non-conventional Oil and Gas Concessions that allow non-conventional oil and gas contracts using a gross scheme split, never be applied.

However, according to him, there are several things that must be ensured in order to split the gross scheme attractive for investors. "We want to emphasize that for existing investors, the criterion is that the government should offer better. Otherwise, they will not take. It's a matter of economics that must be discussed. This, indeed, be proven over time, "he said.

Another thing that should be ensured, says Sammy Hamzah, is the role of the Working Unit of Upstream Oil and Gas (SKK Migas) to manage contracts with gross schemes split. Investors want to make sure whether the business process will be simple and the time required until the production phase
will be shorter.

Advisory Board Indonesian Geologists Association (IAG) Rovicky Dwi Putrohari also criticized the gross scheme split. Some of the incentives offered by the government split always considered linear with the scale of the project. "In fact, it could be the reality is different, such as investment costs to a depth of five meters of blocks may be larger than that has a depth of 50 meters," he said.

He added, there are few incentives that would lead to a split count the economic uncertainty, the price of oil. "Split will change because national oil price (ICP) is reviewed every month. How can commercial that change each month? Whether to continue to operate or not, should be considered, "he said.

Fix Fiscal Policy

Separately, President of the Indonesian Petroleum Association (IPA) Christina Verchere hope the government strengthen fiscal schemes in the oil and gas contracts offered to oil and gas companies. This is to ensure that oil and gas investment in Indonesia back excited and boosting the growth of the national economy.

IPA stated, in the past, the energy sector is the largest contributor to the Indonesian acceptance. In the future, Indonesia needs to ensure that this sector has been retained to be the driver of economic growth. What does this fiscal scheme, Christina did not want to expose. According to him, the fiscal scheme of oil and gas business in each country is a government authority of each country. Moreover, the fiscal scheme is structured to follow the existing regulations and conditions of oil and gas resources in each country.

"We were advised to look for the fiscal scheme to attract investors to Indonesia, the scheme is more competitive compared to other countries. In the next year, we wait for changes that improve the investment climate, "
he said.

Tenny Wibowo Director of the IPA added, with declining oil prices drastically in the past two years, the size of oil and gas reserves that can be developed economically limited. This is considering the wide acceptance in the world oil and gas companies trimmed so that the funds available for investment are also reduced. "This should be a concern. If the investment climate is not good, I worry later reduced (funds) invested in Indonesia, "he said.

According to Christina, it is required of investors Iain is a foregone conclusion. Oil and gas business needs capital big. Not only that, these businesses face uncertainty. That is why, in order to reduce the risk, it needs regulatory certainty that can be used as a basis in a matter of economics of the project.

Christina continued, IPA appreciates the government's measures to improve the investment climate gas. Throughout this year, the IPA and the government establish intense communication to discuss a number of issues
and regulations in order to facilitate oil and gas business in Indonesia. IPA is also invited to discuss the implementation of contracts with gross schemes split on conventional oil and gas. "Gross split would indeed simplify business processes. But what investors are looking for is a regulatory system that is predictable and attractive fiscal scheme. This fiscal scheme is as important as the simplification of business processes, "said Christina.

Looking ahead, the IPA will continue to communicate with the government. IPA will discuss some of the new regulations, including a regulation that obliges oil companies take off by 10% equity participation to local governments.

Member of Commission VII of the House of Representatives Dito Ganinduto said that, although externally the oil and gas business conditions have improved, especially in terms of price, the investor is required legal certainty and consistency of government policy.

"Investor wants the rules do not change, so that they can plan long-term investment activity. The oil and gas investment and long-term investments have a high risk, so the issue of legal certainty is very important, "said Dito.

He took the example of a change in the types of oil and gas production sharing contract be split gross. According Dito, the government has never explained this concept in front of the Parliament and the Economic Observer Energy Hymn Mada University (UGM) Fahmi Radhi said the outlook for oil and gas investment in 2017 was much better than in 2016, in line with rising oil prices. "My estimate oil prices to reach a new balance in the range of US $ 57-60 per barrel," said Fahmi, who is also a former member of the Oil and Gas Governance Team.

Oil and gas companies, particularly large-scale investment in 2016 hold, this year will re-invest them to boost production. However, the upward trend in oil and gas upstream investment will not only Indonesia but also experienced by other countries, especially the Middle East and Vietnam. "So there will be fierce competition to compete for investors. The countries will be competing to provide convenience to attract oil and gas investment had stagnated, "said Fahmi.

Fahmi also assess gross split system need to be supplemented with various facilities, particularly in terms of licensing both the central and local governments. Based on data from SKK Migas, oil and gas investment in Indonesia continues to increase during 2010-2013. In 2010, oil and gas investments were approximately US% 11 billion. This figure rose to US $ 14 billion in 2011, US $ 17 billion in 2012, and reached US $ 18 billion in 2013.

After the period, investments in oil and gas directly trimmed so the price of oil began to fall in late 2014. In 2014, oil and gas investments were recorded in the range of US $ 18 billion. But in the past year, oil and gas investment significantly trimmed down to around US $ 14 billion. While this year, the realization of oil and gas investment is only predicted to reach US $ 11.4 billion.

IN INDONESIAN

Investasi Hulu Migas US$ 4-50 Miliar

Di tengah kekhawatiran akan kebijakan baru Presiden AS Donald Trump, kegiatan investasi di hulu migas yang sempat menurun dalam dua tahun terakhir kembali meningkat 3% menjadi US$ 450 miliar tahun ini. Harga minyak mentah diperkirakan sedikit terangkat dengan break even pada harga US$ 45 per barel. Tahun ini, harga minyak mentah Brent diperkirakan mencapai rata-rata US$ 57 per barel, naik 30% dari US$ 44 per barel pada tahun 2016 “Kegiatan perusahaan migas di hulu mulai meningkat kembali tahun ini. Sedangkan harga minyak mentah, kendati meningkat, tidak akan mengalami lonjakan berarti,” ungkap Andrew Harwood, analis minyak dan gas dari Wood Mackenzie Singapura.

Merespons permintaan akan minyak mentah yang kembali meningkat, perusahaan hulu migas akan menaikkan produksi, termasuk Amerika Serikat di bawah pemerintahan baru. Lonjakan harga yang besar tidak akan terjadi karena penambahan pasokan akan menekan harga.

Meski naik 3%, kata Andrew, total investasi hulu migas tahun ini masih lebih rendah 40% dibanding tahun 2014. Berbeda dengan masa sebelumnya, perusahaan migas kini beralih dari proyek migas yang besar dan kompleks ke proyek yang  lebih kecil dengan tingkat pengembalian modal lebih cepat. “Efisiensi menjadi perhatian utama dengan memanfaatkan teknologi mutakhir,” ujar dia.

Kegiatan investasi di hulu migas, kata Andrew, sangat tergantung pada regulasi sebuah negara. Para investor umumnya membandingkan prospek investasi dan kebijakan fiskal hulu migas di satu negara dengan negara lain. Ada negara yang bagus prospeknya, tapi kurang bagus kebijakan fiskalnya. Ada negara yang bagus kedua-duanya, namun ada pula yang kurang bagus kedua-duanya.

Investasi hulu migas di Indonesia, demikian Andrew, dinilai cukup prospektif dan kebijakan fiskal cukup memberikan insentif. Sedangkan Malaysia dinilai lebih prospektif dari Indonesia. Tapi, kebijakan fiskalnya kalah menarik dibanding Indonesia. Malaysia tidak memberikan insentif sebesar Indonesia. Menurut Wood Mackenzie, Brasil dan Mexico memiliki prospek yang bagus, tapi kebijakan fiskalnya kurang mendukung.

Sementara Norwegia, Mozambique, dan Nigeria lebih bagus dari Indonesia dalam insentif fiskal dan prospek investasi. Penilaian Wood Mackenzie sudah mempertimbangkan kebijakan gross split yang mulai diterapkan pemerintah. Meski belum ada investor asing yang memanfaatkannya, skema bagi hasil dalam gross split dinilai cukup menarik. Hingga hari ini, baru Blok Offshore North-West Java Pertamina, yang memanfaatkan kebijakan baru ini.

Skema pembagian gross split diberlakukan bagi perusahaan baru. Sedang perusahaan yang sedang berjalan tetap mengacu peraturan lama yang berbasis cost recovery. Vice President External Relations SKK Migas Taslim Z Yunus menjelaskan, pihaknya belum bisa menilai efektivitas regulasi baru yang diterapkan lewat Peraturan Menteri ESDM itu. “Kebijakannya masih baru. Investor masih mempelajari,” ujarnya.

Kalangan pelaku bisnis hulu migas yang hadir dalam diskusi optimistis, investasi di hulu migas di Indonesia mulai meningkat tahun ini. Vice President Development and Relations Conoco Phillips Joang Laksanto mengatakan, gairah investasi migas tahun ini lebih disebabkan oleh kenaikan harga minyak mentah. Bukan karena kebijakan pemerintah yang belum teruji. Dalam menghitung bagi hasil gross split, komponen yang diperhitungkan adalah cadangan migas, biaya investasi, dan harga. “Mestinya perhitungan ini diserahkan saja pada investor. Tapi, pengelolaan migas di hulu masih tunduk pada Undang-Undang Migas,” ungkapnya.

Investasi di hulu migas di Indonesia, kata Joang, cukup berat. Karena success ratio di bawah 10%, jauh di bawah rata-rata dunia yang mencapai 30%. Ketika melakukan eksplorasi, biaya besar sudah harus dikeluarkan
investor untuk sebuah keberhasilan di bawah 10%. Seperti diketahui, mulai Januari 2017, pemerintah mengubah skema kontrak bagi hasil (PSC) pada kontrak-kontrak baru migas. Jika yang digunakan sebelumnya adalah skema biaya yang dapat dikembalikan (cost recovery) maka yang diterapkan dalam aturan baru adalah skema gross split.

Ketentuan itu dituangkan dalam Peraturan Menteri ESDM No 8 Tahun 2017 tentang Kontrak Bagi Hasil Gross Split. Wakil Menteri ESDM Arcandra Tahar menyatakan, penerapan skema gross split atau bagi hasil kotor dalam kontrak kerja sama (production sharing contract/ PSC) migas tidak akan merugikan negara. Skema ini justru membuat negara terhindar dari potensi membengkaknya biaya proyek migas, sehingga penerimaan negara yang diperoleh dari sektor migas lebih pasti dan terjamin.

Arcandra menegaskan, investor yang merasa split yang diperolehnya masih kurang, dapat menyampaikannya kepada pemerintah. Bagi hasil setelah memasukkan variable split dan progressive split masih terbuka untuk diubah. “Kalau dari komersial, ada ruang untuk negosiasi kurang lebih 5%,” tutur dia.

Hal itu, kata Arcandra, sesuai Pasal 7 Peraturan Menteri ESDM No 8 Tahun 2017 tentang Kontrak Bagi Hasil Gross Split yang menjadi dasar penerapan gross split. Dalam beleid ini disebutkan, ketika perhitungan komersialisasi lapangan tidak mencapai keekonomian tertentu, kontraktor mendapat tambahan split maksimal 5%. “Sebaliknya, dalam perhitungan komersialisasi lapangan melebihi keekonomian tertentu, negara boleh mengambil tarnbahan split 5%,” tutur dia.

Kurang Menarik

Sementara itu, investor menilai skema gross split yang ditawarkan pemerintah masih kurang menarik. Investor menginginkan, meski skema kontrak berganti menjadi gross split, bagi hasil yang diterima minimal sama dengan ketika memakai skema cost recovery. Investor juga meminta ada tambahan insentif untuk eksplorasi. Selain itu, terdapat ketidakpastian terkait pelaksanaan kemudahan proses bisnis yang dijanjikan pemerintah.

Chief Executive Officer (CED) & President PT Ephindo Sammy Hamzah mengatakan, investor migas non-konvensional mengusulkan penerapan skema gross split dalam kontrak migas agar proyek lebih menarik. Karena itu, kata Sammy, pihaknya sangat mengapresiasi upaya pemerintah yang kemudian menerbitkan peraturan menteri soal gross split. Apalagi Peraturan Menteri 38/2015 tentang Percepatan Pengusahaan Migas Non-konvensional yang memungkinkan kontrak migas non-konvensional menggunakan skema gross split, tak kunjung dapat diterapkan.

Namun, menurut dia, ada beberapa hal yang harus dipastikan agar skema gross split menarik bagi investor. “Kami ingin tekankan bahwa bagi investor eksisting, standarnya adalah pemerintah harus menawarkan yang lebih baik. Kalau tidak, mereka tidak akan ambil. Ini soal keekonomian saja yang harus dibicarakan. Ini memang baru akan terbukti seiring dengan berjalannya waktu,” papar dia. 

Hal lain yang harus dipastikan, kata Sammy Hamzah, adalah peran Satuan Kerja Kerja Pelaksana Kegiatan Usaha Hulu Minyak dan Gas Bumi (SKK Migas) dalam mengelola kontrak dengan skema gross split. Investor ingin memastikan apakah benar proses bisnis akan lebih simpel dan waktu yang dibutuhkan sampai tahap produksi
bakal lebih pendek.

Dewan Penasihat Ikatan Ahli Geologi Indonesia (IAG) Rovicky Dwi Putrohari juga mengkritisi skema gross split. Beberapa insentif split yang ditawarkan pemerintah selalu dianggap linier dengan skala proyek. “Padahal,
bisa jadi kenyataannya berbeda, seperti biaya investasi untuk blok kedalaman lima meter bisa jadi lebih besar dari yang memiliki kedalaman 50 meter,” tutur dia.

Dia menambahkan, ada beberapa insentif split yang justru menimbulkan ketidakpastian hitungan keekonomian, yakni harga minyak. “Split akan berubah karena harga minyak nasional (ICP) ditinjau setiap bulan. Bagaimana bisa komersial kalau berubah tiap bulan? Apakah akan terus beroperasi atau tidak, ini harus dipikirkan,” kata dia.

Perbaiki Kebijakan Fiskal
Dihubungi terpisah, Presiden Indonesia Petroleum Association (IPA) Christina Verchere berharap pemerintah memperkuat skema fiskal dalam kontrak migas yang ditawarkan kepada perusahaan migas. Hal ini guna memastikan agar investasi migas di Indonesia kembali bergairah sehingga mendorong pertumbuhan ekonomi nasional.

IPA menyatakan, di masa lalu, sektor energi merupakan penyumbang terbesar penerimaan bagi Indonesia. Ke depannya, Indonesia perlu memastikan agar sektor ini dipertahankan agar menjadi pendorong pertumbuhan ekonomi.
Seperti apa skema fiskal ini, Christina tidak mau memaparkan. Menurut dia, skema fiskal bisnis migas di setiap negara merupakan wewenang pemerintah negara masing-masing. Apalagi, skema fiskal ini disusun dengan mengikuti regulasi yang berlaku dan kondisi sumber daya migas di setiap negara.

“Kami menyarankan untuk dicarikan skema fiskal yang dapat menarik investor ke Indonesia, skema yang lebih kompetitif dibandingkan dengan negara lain. Pada tahun depan, kami menunggu perubahan yang meningkatkan iklim investasi,”
tuturnya.

Direktur IPA Tenny Wibowo menambahkan, dengan menurunnya harga minyak yang sangat drastis dalam dua tahun ini, ukuran cadangan migas yang dapat dikembangkan secara ekonomis menjadi terbatas. Hal ini mengingat penerimaan seluruh perusahaan migas di dunia terpangkas sehingga dana yang tersedia untuk investasi juga berkurang. “Ini harus jadi perhatian. Kalau iklim investasi kurang bagus, saya khawatir nantinya berkurang (dana) yang ditanamkan di Indonesia,” kata dia. 

Menurut Christina, hal Iain yang dibutuhkan investor adalah kepastian. Bisnis migas membutuhkan modal besar. Tak hanya itu, bisnis ini menghadapi ketidakpastian. Itu sebabnya, untuk mengurangi risiko, dibutuhkan kepastian regulasi yang bisa dijadikan dasar dalam hitungan keekonomian proyek.

Christina melanjutkan, IPA mengapresiasi langkah pemerintah untuk memperbaiki iklim investasi migas. Sepanjang tahun ini, IPA dan pemerintah menjalin komunikasi yang intens guna membahas sejumlah masalah
dan regulasi guna mempermudah bisnis migas di Indonesia. IPA juga diajak membahas penerapan kontrak dengan skema gross split pada migas konvensional. “Gross split memang akan menyederhanakan proses bisnis. Tetapi apa yang dicari investor adalah sistem regulasi yang dapat diprediksi dan skema fiskal yang menarik. Skema fiskal ini sama pentingnya dengan simplifikasi proses bisnis,” kata Christina.

Ke depannya, IPA akan terus berkomunikasi dengan pemerintah. IPA akan membahas beberapa regulasi baru, termasuk beleid yang mewajibkan perusahaan migas melepas sebesar 10% hak partisipasinya ke pemerintah daerah.

      Anggota Komisi VII DPR RI Dito Ganinduto mengatakan, meski secara eksternal kondisi bisnis migas mengalami perbaikan, khususnya dari sisi harga, yang dibutuhkan investor adalah kepastian hukum dan konsistensi kebijakan dari pemerintah.

“Investor maunya peraturan jangan berubah-ubah, supaya mereka bisa merencanakan kegiatan investasi jangka panjang. Investasi migas itu investasi jangka panjang dan memiliki risiko tinggi, jadi masalah kepastian hukum ini sangat penting," kata Dito.

Dia ambil contoh perubahan jenis kontrak migas dari production sharing menjadi gross split. Menurut Dito, pemerintah belum pernah memaparkan konsep ini di hadapan DPR Pengamat Ekonomi dan Energi Universitas Gajah Madah (UGM) Fahmi Radhi mengatakan, prospek investasi migas 2017 memang jauh lebih baik dibanding 2016, sejalan dengan meningkatnya harga minyak.  “Perkiraan saya harga minyak akan mencapai keseimbangan baru di kisaran US$ 57-60 per barel,” kata Fahmi yang juga mantan anggota Tim Tata Kelola Migas.

Perusahaan-perusahaan migas, khususnya skala besar yang pada tahun 2016 menahan investasi, pada tahun ini akan kembali menanamkan investasi mereka untuk menggenjot produksi. Namun, Tren peningkatan investasi hulu migas ini tidak hanya akan dialami oleh Indonesia tapi juga negara-negara lain terutama Timur Tengah dan Vietnam. “Jadi akan ada persaingan ketat untuk memperebutkan investor. Negara-negara akan berlomba-lomba memberikan kemudahan untuk menarik investasi migas yang sempat stagnan,” kata Fahmi.

Fahmi juga menilai sistem gross split perlu ditambah dengan berbagai kemudahan, khususnya dalam hal perizinan baik oleh pemerintah pusat maupun daerah. Berdasarkan data SKK Migas, investasi migas di Indonesia terus meningkat selama 2010-2013. Pada 2010, investasi migas tercatat sekitar US% 11 miliar. Angka ini kemudian naik menjadi US$ 14 miliar pada 2011, US$ 17 miliar pada 2012, dan mencapai US$ 18 miliar pada 2013.

Periode setalah itu, investasi migas langsung terpangkas begitu harga minyak mulai turun pada akhir 2014. Pada 2014, investasi migas tercatat masih di kisaran US$ 18 miliar. Namun pada tahun lalu, investasi migas terpangkas signifikan menjadi sekitar US$ 14 miliar. Sementara pada tahun ini, realisasi investasi migas diprediksi hanya mencapai US$ 11,4 miliar. 

Investor Daily, Page-1, Tuesday, Jan, 24, 2017